aaron.ballman added a comment. In D122983#3452994 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122983#3452994>, @rsmith wrote:
> I think we should just make this an error by default in C99 onwards; Out of curiosity -- do you think we should remove the `DefaultIgnore` in C89 mode so that we warn by default there (perhaps as a follow up)? Also, I presume you expect `diag::ext_implicit_lib_function_decl` to behave the same way (warn in C89, warn-as-err in C99 and up) as part of this patch? CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D122983/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D122983 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
