junaire marked an inline comment as done.
junaire added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst:122
   This fixes Issue `Issue 54817 
<https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54817>`_.
+- No longer produce a wrong redefinition error if variables are defined in 
if/for/switch init statements
+  and lambda.
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
> I think this isn't accurate, right?  I thought this had to do with lambdas 
> alone? Is the following accurate?
> 
> `Clang should no longer incorrectly diagnose a variable declaration inside of 
> a lambda expression inside the scope of a if/while/for/switch init statement 
> as a redeclaration.  This fixes ...'.
> I think this isn't accurate, right?  I thought this had to do with lambdas 
> alone? Is the following accurate?
> 
> `Clang should no longer incorrectly diagnose a variable declaration inside of 
> a lambda expression inside the scope of a if/while/for/switch init statement 
> as a redeclaration.  This fixes ...'.

Thanks for the suggestion, It's my fault, I really shouldn't be sleeping in my 
English grammar class...


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D123840/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D123840

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to