aaron.ballman marked an inline comment as done. aaron.ballman added a comment.
In D123627#3451269 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D123627#3451269>, @uweigand wrote: > It looks like this caused the LNT build bot to fail (at least on s390x), > because one of the test cases now triggers this error: > https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/45/builds/6787 > > /usr/bin/make -f > SingleSource/Regression/C/gcc-c-torture/execute/ieee/CMakeFiles/GCC-C-execute-ieee-compare-fp-4.dir/build.make > > SingleSource/Regression/C/gcc-c-torture/execute/ieee/CMakeFiles/GCC-C-execute-ieee-compare-fp-4.dir/build > > /home/uweigand/sandbox/buildbot/clang-s390x-linux-lnt/test/test-suite/SingleSource/Regression/C/gcc-c-torture/execute/ieee/20030331-1.c:6:1: > error: conflicting types for 'rintf' > rintf () > ^ > > /home/uweigand/sandbox/buildbot/clang-s390x-linux-lnt/test/test-suite/SingleSource/Regression/C/gcc-c-torture/execute/ieee/20030331-1.c:6:1: > note: previous implicit declaration is here > make[2]: Entering directory > '/home/uweigand/sandbox/buildbot/clang-s390x-linux-lnt/test/sandbox/build' > > /home/uweigand/sandbox/buildbot/clang-s390x-linux-lnt/test/test-suite/SingleSource/Regression/C/gcc-c-torture/execute/ieee/20030331-1.c:29:14: > error: too few arguments to function call, expected 1, have 0 > if (rintf () != -2.0) > ~~~~~ ^ > 2 errors generated. > > I guess the error is valid, but should either be disabled for this LNT test, > or else the test fixed. Thank you for letting me know -- I've speculatively fixed the issue in 726901d06aab2f92d684d28507711308368c29d6 Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D123627/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D123627 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
