ymandel added a comment. In D123586#3446956 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D123586#3446956>, @xazax.hun wrote:
> Yeah, this is a hard problem in general. This looks like a sensible > workaround for the short term, but I'm looking forward to a better solution. > I'm a bit worried that the memory model will need some upgrades to properly > solve this problem. Thanks for the quick review! Yes, I have my concerns as well. It seems like some amount of a) additional allocation stabilization/memoization, b) introduction of explicit widening operator and c) structural comparison will fully solve the problem. Solving this properly is a high priority. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D123586/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D123586 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
