awarzynski added a comment. In D123297#3436867 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D123297#3436867>, @mehdi_amini wrote:
> `-mmlir` is fine with me, but note that MLIR has much less global options > than LLVM: you will only get access to context and passmanager options and > not individual passes flags. That's not a criticism :) > (that's what makes it not likely to have conflicts by the way: the set of > MLIR option is well identified) Thanks for taking a look! All this should be fine - the main rationale for this patch is to enable MLIR options in `flang-new` so that tests using `tco` or `bbc` (and which use MLIR options) can be ported to use `flang-new`. We were discussing this recently in https://reviews.llvm.org/D121171. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D123297/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D123297 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
