sammccall added a comment. In D116514#3230255 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D116514#3230255>, @njames93 wrote:
> Shouldn't the constructors that need `std::move` also ensure the `<utility>` > header is also included, or at least transitively included. We don't want to > generate constructors that wont compile. I've added this just as a FIXME for now, because we're missing "framework" support for adding includes and composing separate edits in tweaks. I think this is probably only a small obstacle in practice, it seems pretty rare to write `std::move` and need to add the `#include` for it to compile. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D116514/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D116514 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
