nridge added a comment. In D115187#3192034 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D115187#3192034>, @sammccall wrote:
> A change that probably goes along with this one is having RecursiveASTVisitor > traverse the syntactic form instead of the semantic one if traversal of > implicit code is off. I believe that's already the behaviour that falls out of the current implementation <https://searchfox.org/llvm/rev/1f0b8ba47ab0f1dc678099d4830d0cc0d10850b6/clang/include/clang/AST/RecursiveASTVisitor.h#2809>: DEF_TRAVERSE_STMT(CoawaitExpr, { if (!getDerived().shouldVisitImplicitCode()) { TRY_TO_TRAVERSE_OR_ENQUEUE_STMT(S->getOperand()); ShouldVisitChildren = false; } }) If we are not visiting implicit code, we only visit the operand, otherwise we visit all subexpressions. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D115187/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D115187 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
