Author: Iain Sandoe Date: 2022-03-25T14:55:13Z New Revision: cf396c56e7df756d460a456f99ceab1b5d2c2e37
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cf396c56e7df756d460a456f99ceab1b5d2c2e37 DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cf396c56e7df756d460a456f99ceab1b5d2c2e37.diff LOG: [C++20][Modules] Correct an assert for modules-ts. When adding the support for modules partitions we added an assert that the actual status of Global Module Fragments matches the state machine that is driven by the module; keyword. That does not apply to the modules-ts case, where there is an implicit GMF. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122394 Added: Modified: clang/lib/Sema/SemaModule.cpp Removed: ################################################################################ diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaModule.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaModule.cpp index a115834d334c4..e28de8c79b273 100644 --- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaModule.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaModule.cpp @@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ Sema::ActOnModuleDecl(SourceLocation StartLoc, SourceLocation ModuleLoc, ModuleScopes.back().Module->Kind == Module::GlobalModuleFragment) GlobalModuleFragment = ModuleScopes.back().Module; - assert((!getLangOpts().CPlusPlusModules || + assert((!getLangOpts().CPlusPlusModules || getLangOpts().ModulesTS || SeenGMF == (bool)GlobalModuleFragment) && "mismatched global module state"); _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits