royjacobson marked an inline comment as done. royjacobson added a comment. In D122083#3402289 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122083#3402289>, @erichkeane wrote:
> Can you add some tests for the OTHER forms of 'auto' as well? We have > `decltype(auto)` and `auto_type`, and I want to make sure whatever we do with > those 'looks right'. Can we have constraints on `__auto_type`? As far as I understand it, it's a C extension with very limited C++ support. About decltype(auto) - we can't have `*`/`&` modifiers with it, and that's already covered by tests like p7-cxx14. So (I think?) it's always invalid code and it fails earlier during parsing. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D122083/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D122083 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
