ymandel marked 2 inline comments as done.
ymandel added a comment.

In D122143#3396729 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122143#3396729>, @xazax.hun wrote:

> In D122143#3396695 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122143#3396695>, @ymandel wrote:
>
>> So, do you mean to add a FIXME to move to allowlist, or do you mean to hold 
>> off until we've switched? I have a short-term interest in getting this 
>> through for a particular usecase, but I understand if you feel it just not a 
>> good idea. Regardless, I'm going to get started exploring an allowlist 
>> approach.
>
> I see the precedent of FIXMEs getting followed up in this effort, so I'm fine 
> with a FIXME for now :)

Thanks for the confidence. FIXME added.



================
Comment at: 
clang/lib/Analysis/FlowSensitive/Models/UncheckedOptionalAccessModel.cpp:301
+        cxxOperatorCallExpr(anyOf(hasOverloadedOperatorName("->"),
+                                  hasOverloadedOperatorName("*")),
+                            unless(hasArgument(0, 
expr(hasOptionalType())))))));
----------------
xazax.hun wrote:
> It is probably rarely used, but one could use `std::unique_ptr` with an array 
> of `std::optional`s and use `operator[]` to access the optional.
I added a note to the option itself and also changed its name to be more 
specific.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D122143/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D122143

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to