HazardyKnusperkeks added a comment.
This is an enormous patch. @MyDeveloperDay mentioned different places which
could be separate patches, but in addition could the adding of the verilog
language be split up, so that one can comprehend the patch in a reasonable time?
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp:534
continue;
- parseBlock(/*MustBeDeclaration=*/false, /*AddLevels=*/1u,
- /*MunchSemi=*/true, /*UnindentWhitesmithBraces=*/false,
- CanContainBracedList,
+ parseBlock(/*Flags=*/CanContainBracedList *
BLOCK_CAN_CONTAIN_BRACED_LIST,
+ /*AddLevels=*/1u,
----------------
MyDeveloperDay wrote:
> sstwcw wrote:
> > One of the people in charge said multiplying with a boolean might trigger
> > warnings. Here I compiled with gcc. This version doesn't trigger
> > warnings. The other way to do it, `CanContainBracedList ?
> > BLOCK_CAN_CONTAIN_BRACED_LIST : 0`, triggers a warning that I shouldn't mix
> > enum and integer.
> this is a hard no from me.
bool should only be used as boolean value, not as integral, even if c++ allows
it.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.h:110
+ BLOCK_VERILOG_HIER = 0x10
+ };
+ IfStmtKind parseBlock(unsigned Flags = 0u, unsigned AddLevels = 1u,
----------------
MyDeveloperDay wrote:
> Oh! please no... I can't say how much of my life has been ruined by flags
> and the various `| || & && ~&` bugs, I'm sorry I'd rather have a structure
> and it be clear
struct would be better, yes.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D121758/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D121758
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
