martong added a comment. In D120824#3369563 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D120824#3369563>, @balazske wrote:
> > I think that the problem may be related to the fact that the in-class > initializer is not used by the code in the "To" AST (in > //ctu-cxxdefaultinitexpr.cpp// the problem is with `QMultiHash::d` field). > Probably the expression node in the field is set only if it is used by any > `CXXDefaultInitExpr`, but the `hasInClassInitializer` value is set always if > the code contains in-class initializer. I can try to make a unit test for > this case ... Thanks, that'd be great. > ... (but the lit test is good to have because it is more complex and can > reveal other problems). I agree. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D120824/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D120824 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
