qiucf added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/builtins-ppc-xlcompat-math.c:98 // CHECK-NEXT: store double [[D:%.*]], double* [[D_ADDR]], align 8 +// CHECK-COUNT-3: load double, double* [[D_ADDR]], align 8 // CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP0:%.*]] = load double, double* [[D_ADDR]], align 8 ---------------- shchenz wrote: > If we improve the check lines to CHECK-COUNT, do we still need the original > CHECKs? Yes, otherwise we can't capture the right operands of `llvm.ppc.fnmsub.f64`. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D116015/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D116015 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
