EricWF added a comment. Gosh darn it Howard. Your like 10 minutes ahead of me.
Here is a constexpr gcd test. https://gist.github.com/EricWF/46ea4489f405ec9f83325a278fe99535 ================ Comment at: include/experimental/numeric:50 @@ +49,3 @@ +struct __abs<_Tp, true> { + _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY _Tp operator()(_Tp __t) const noexcept { return _VSTD::abs(__t); } +}; ---------------- Both the call operator and `abs` are not constexpr. ================ Comment at: include/experimental/numeric:55 @@ +54,3 @@ +struct __abs<_Tp, false> { + _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY _Tp operator()(_Tp __t) const noexcept { return __t; } +}; ---------------- Call operator is not constexpr. http://reviews.llvm.org/D21343 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
