jyknight added a comment. In D119051#3316026 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D119051#3316026>, @dblaikie wrote:
> Ah, looks like this is the existing > https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/66 If you're going to change the ABI, you might as well tackle the rest of the differences mentioned in that issue while you're in there. That is, neither marking anything "= delete", nor creating a user-defined move assignment operator should mark it non-pod according to the GCC-compatible rules. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D119051/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D119051 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
