tra added a comment.

In D120132#3345534 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D120132#3345534>, @yaxunl wrote:

> I just found one issue with the current patch. It adds HIP include path for 
> non-HIP programs.
>
> We should only add HIP include path for JobAction with HIP offloading kind. 
> However, AddClangSystemIncludeArgs is not per job action.
> I feel I should not complicate AddClangSystemIncludeArgs API by making it 
> accept a JobAction argument.

I'm not sure I understand. In general we do want host and device-side 
compilations to be as close as we can make them and that includes include 
paths. `AddClangSystemIncludeArgs` is a toolchain method and does exactly what 
we need -- add the same include path to both host and device compilations when 
HIP (or CUDA) toolchain is used.
I don't quite see how you could end up with a HIP toolchain in a non-HIP 
compilation.

What do I miss?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D120132/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D120132

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to