urnathan added a comment. In D119409#3332313 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D119409#3332313>, @dblaikie wrote:
> That's interesting data. I guess one could emit the out-of-line bodies into their own sections, and then rely on linker section GC to elide them in the static link. But if you're building an SO, you presumably need to provide them unilaterally in the static link, and callers would use a PLT to get to them. One could continue emitting them COMDAT, and unilaterally emit them in the module interface's object file, but that will still leave the SO problem. I think. > I'm not sure if Richard Smith made a choice about not homing inline functions > in C++20 modules because of these results, or for other reasons, or just as a > consequence of the implementation - Richard and I discussed taking advantage of this kind of new home location, certainly for key-less polymorphic classes. I was against it as it was more work :) Blame me. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D119409/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D119409 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
