jrtc27 added a comment. In D93298#3332038 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D93298#3332038>, @xbolva00 wrote:
>>> It appears that this is causing an assertion segfault in a rustc test over >>> at our experimental rust + llvm@head bot: > > I dont think that patch author is required to debug this issue for > "experimental rust + llvm@head" - downstream. > >>> Since I don't have a rust environment > > There is no requirement, indeed. LLVM devs are not responsible to keep > ""experimental rust + llvm@head" working. They're required to assist with fixing regressions that show when compiling legitimate IR. An IR reproducer was given, so no Rust toolchain knowledge should be needed, at that point it's the LLVM dev's responsibility, and if they can't fix it in a timely manner then it should be backed out. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D93298/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D93298 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
