rsmith added a comment. In D112916#3290365 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D112916#3290365>, @serge-sans-paille wrote:
> @rsmith : once the licensing issue has been fixed, can we merge that patch or > do you have any other thought? I have no concerns once the licensing question is resolved and the other reviewers are happy. I agree with Corentin that we should be exactly following the Unicode Consortium's recommendations. I think that while this doesn't fully address Aaron's concern, it at least gives us a rationale for our treatment of different scripts and seems more defensible than our coming up with some additional rules of our own. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D112916/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D112916 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
