Quuxplusone added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp:3018-3019
   do {
+    bool LambdaThisTimeAllowed = LambdaNextTimeAllowed;
+    LambdaNextTimeAllowed = false;
+
----------------
Nit: For this pattern, consider `bool LambdaThisTimeAllowed = 
std::exchange(LambdaNextTimeAllowed, false);`


================
Comment at: clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp:3102
+      LambdaNextTimeAllowed = true;
+      LLVM_FALLTHROUGH;
+    case tok::numeric_constant:
----------------
This seems like an overuse of fallthrough; how about simply
```
    LambdaNextTimeAllowed = true;
    nextToken();
    break;
```
?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D119893/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D119893

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
  • [PATCH] D1198... Björn Schäpers via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] ... Arthur O'Dwyer via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] ... Marek Kurdej via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] ... Björn Schäpers via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] ... Marek Kurdej via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] ... Björn Schäpers via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] ... Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] ... Marek Kurdej via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] ... Björn Schäpers via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] ... Marek Kurdej via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] ... Björn Schäpers via Phabricator via cfe-commits

Reply via email to