kbobyrev accepted this revision.
kbobyrev added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LG, thanks!
================
Comment at:
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/modernize-use-trailing-return-type-cxx20.cpp:71
+ template <typename T>
+ requires(T{0}) //
+ friend constexpr auto
----------------
Febbe wrote:
> kbobyrev wrote:
> > nit: `//` looks unrelated
> I used the `//` to break the line there (avoids // clang-format off/on)
>
> in my opinion, it should look like this:
>
> `template <typename T> requires(T{0}) \n`
I think it's better spelled out explicitly (otherwise the intent is unclear) or
just have the clang-format apply the formatting (since it doesn't seem very
important here as it's a test).
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D118847/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D118847
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
