aaron.ballman added a comment. In D118804#3304261 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D118804#3304261>, @urnathan wrote:
> While C2X has blessed such smaller alignments, the x86_64 ABI (in > particular), has not. However, using that ABI to justify 'It. Is. 16. > Bytes.', is really an exercise in reality denial at this point. just thought > I'd make it clear we have conflicting standards and practicality to attend to. Do we want me to report back to WG14 with information that N2293 might not suitable for adoption into C2x? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D118804/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D118804 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
