Anastasia added a comment. In D118999#3296899 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D118999#3296899>, @azabaznov wrote:
> It seems hard to find a direct mention in the spec, but in the API spec: > > //CL_DEVICE_SUB_GROUP_INDEPENDENT_FORWARD_PROGRESS: Is CL_TRUE if this device > supports independent forward progress of sub-groups, CL_FALSE otherwise. This > query must return CL_TRUE for devices that support the cl_khr_subgroups > extension, and must return CL_FALSE for devices that do not support > subgroups.// Ok, I would agree that the wording doesn't seem identical since the extension explicitly details forward progress behavior but the feature doesn't: https://www.khronos.org/registry/OpenCL/specs/3.0-unified/html/OpenCL_Ext.html#cl_khr_subgroups But I think it would make sense to add wording of it in the feature spec too otherwise it appears unspecified? Anyway, at present, since they are not identical having separate handling of these teo seems reasonable. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D118999/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D118999 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
