tyb0807 added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Basic/Targets/AArch64.cpp:229
MacroBuilder &Builder) const {
+ // FIXME: this does not handle the case where MOPS is disabled using +nomops
+ Builder.defineMacro("__ARM_FEATURE_MOPS", "1");
----------------
chill wrote:
> What's the deal with `"+nomops"` ? This FIXME sort of contradicts with an
> earlier comment
>
>
> > Add support for +nomops
>
>
I wanted to add support for `+nomops`, but I think it is advisable to keep that
in a separate commit to not block this review, so I reverted it with a FIXME
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D118199/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D118199
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
