dblaikie added a comment.

In D5980#3253378 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D5980#3253378>, @dblaikie wrote:

> Looks like @dexonsmith got this (putting the ownership in `Chain` & using 
> some iterator adapters to narrow the cleanup scope/fallout) in 
> rGa897f7cd40b12f693acbb04b81ef928244637aae 
> <https://reviews.llvm.org/rGa897f7cd40b12f693acbb04b81ef928244637aae>. Thanks 
> @dexonsmith!

And just because I was looking at the code anyway, I migrated the 
`FirstVisitState` linked list to `unique_ptr` (thought about `forward_list` but 
given the handling of raw nodes, it seemed simpler not to do that) in 
rGbaa9b7c3c83ab6e4dfb15b8d7815a9958d5b5810 
<https://reviews.llvm.org/rGbaa9b7c3c83ab6e4dfb15b8d7815a9958d5b5810>


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D5980/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D5980

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to