HazardyKnusperkeks resigned from this revision.
HazardyKnusperkeks added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/Format/Format.h:3059
+  /// and ``while``) in C++ according to the LLVM coding style.
+  /// \warning
+  ///  This option will be renamed and expanded to support other styles!
----------------
owenpan wrote:
> HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:
> > This should be two warning blocks.
> Can you elaborate? I simply copied the format of the existing warning block. 
> The alignment of the `\code` block below is off by 1 though.
One Warning that the option is going to be renamed.

The other warning regarding the code changes.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp:466
+
+bool UnwrappedLineParser::parseLevel(bool HasOpeningBrace, IfStmtKind *IfKind) 
{
+  const bool IsPrecededByCommentOrPPDirective =
----------------
owenpan wrote:
> HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:
> > This should be an enum, a bool suggests that the return value is a 
> > failure/success indicator.
> Most of the `parse...()` functions return `void` with no indication of 
> pass/fail. Some of them return `bool`, e.g. `parseObjCProtocol()`, which 
> doesn't indicate pass/fail according to the function header comment. I will 
> add a similar comment.
Yeah I'm out here.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D116316/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D116316

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to