Quuxplusone accepted this revision.
Quuxplusone added a comment.

LGTM FWIW.
I'm not the right person to approve for libc, but I'm not sure any of the 
currently listed reviewers are any more appropriate either. So you should find 
and ping a new reviewer, or just ship it, at your discretion. :)



================
Comment at: clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst:179
+  in C++ code; the STL ``<atomic>`` header also controls the behavior of these
+  macros and is not impacted by these changes. The ``<stdatomic.h>`` diagnostic
+  can be disabled by defining the ``_CLANG_DISABLE_CRT_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS``
----------------



CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D112221/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D112221

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to