arsenm added a comment. In D109885#3203444 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D109885#3203444>, @JonChesterfield wrote:
> In D109885#3203412 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D109885#3203412>, @arsenm wrote: > >> We should have versioned libraries and well defined ABI breaks. The build >> should know what runtime versions it requires and account when searching > > If we're playing that game, ROCm should be strictly an extension of upstream > LLVM, such that code which accidentally or intentionally picks up parts of > ROCm while expecting parts of trunk runs correctly. I'd be happy with the > easier objective of making it difficult to accidentally splice together parts > of different toolchains at runtime. ROCm has as much to do with llvm as the linux kernel does. The compiler and runtime version should not be so tightly linked / the runtime so unstable. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D109885/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D109885 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
