martong added a comment. In D115149#3195377 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D115149#3195377>, @ASDenysPetrov wrote:
> @martong > Thanks for clarification. > >> TLDR, it is recommended to use the arcanist. > > I'm not able to use arcanist. It doesn't work on Windows (at least I've tryed > several ways to set up it). > > BTW. I found a revision from which the > test(//symbol-simplification-nonloc-loc.cpp//) file starts to assert. It's > your one D113754 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D113754>. You can checkout a > revision before and test the file. I think we should investigate it deeper to > understand the real cause. Yes, as of D113754 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D113754>, we handle `IntSymExprs` in the SValBuilder, and the half of the test cases added by Balazs are such (`nonloc_OP_loc`). These are the cases that triggers the assertion. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D115149/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D115149 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
