carlosgalvezp added a comment.

> me pretty far behind on reviews

Wow, that's a lot to review! I will keep it in mind and hopefully only ping you 
when I have a nice final design ready to go. Really appreciate your early 
feedback!

> I'd like to make sure I'm on the same page as you.

Yes, exactly, from the RFC we agreed that the desired outcome of this patch 
would be that the same diagnostics and fixits are emitted, regardless of the 
alias checks actually running. I.e. this patch should not have any visible 
effects towards the user (other than faster runtime). The patch, as it is right 
now _will_ eliminate those diagnostics (since the alias checks are removed from 
the list), which to my understanding are not desirable. In order to implement 
this, the primary check needs to emit copies of the same diagnostic as if it 
were the alias check.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D114317/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D114317

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to