nickdesaulniers added a comment. In D115471#3184384 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D115471#3184384>, @jyknight wrote:
> It's rather sad that GCC made the quite-unintuitive decision to number the > arguments in this way -- LONG AFTER clang had already implemented the other > way... I doubt it was intentional or tested or that it's too late to at least file a bug report. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103640 Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D115471/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D115471 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
