aaron.ballman accepted this revision. aaron.ballman added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
I'm a bit worried about using `hasAncestor()` (that has a tendency to match in surprising nested locations), but I can't come up with a test case that would be an issue, so this LGTM. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D114299/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D114299 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
