rjmccall added a comment. The only alternative to this that I can see would be for the invalid code to produce more valid-seeming AST.
Are deduction guides just not normally allowed for methods? Also, while I don't think it would eliminate the need to be defensive here, our recovery from misnamed constructors is pretty bad, and it would be great if we recognized that pattern in the parser. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D112616/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D112616 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
