Eugene.Zelenko added a subscriber: Eugene.Zelenko.
Eugene.Zelenko added a comment.

I think will be good idea to try this check with LLVM STL too.


================
Comment at: docs/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-emplace.rst:47
@@ +46,3 @@
+
+In this case the calls of push_back won't be replaced.
+
----------------
Please highlight push_back with ``.

================
Comment at: docs/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-emplace.rst:55
@@ +54,3 @@
+
+This is because replacing it with emplace_back could cause a leak of this
+this pointer, if emplace_back would throw exception before emplacement
----------------
Please highlight emplace_back with ``. Same below.

================
Comment at: test/clang-tidy/modernize-use-emplace.cpp:12
@@ +11,3 @@
+  void emplace_back(Args &&... args);
+};
+template <typename T>
----------------
Please insert new line.

================
Comment at: test/clang-tidy/modernize-use-emplace.cpp:78
@@ +77,3 @@
+  operator S() { return S{}; }
+};
+struct Zoz {
----------------
Please insert new line.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D20964



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to