owenpan added a comment. In D115064#3170615 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D115064#3170615>, @curdeius wrote:
> Maybe using `llvm::SmallVector` with some well-thought (data-based) static > number of elements would be better here, WDYT? I tend to agree as LLVM style <https://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#picking-the-right-data-structure-for-a-task> prefers `SmallVector` to `vector`. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D115064/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D115064 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
