foad added a comment. In D114957#3167700 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D114957#3167700>, @arsenm wrote:
> I think this macro is purely terrible and should not be added (and at least > should be all caps?). If we can't just hard break users, I would rather just > leave the builtin signatures broken OK, how about D115032 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D115032>? Personally I have no opinion about what's best to do with the OpenCL builtins, but I would like to make progress with changing the intrinsics. So I have a slight preference for D115032 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D115032> because it gives me a way forward without changing OpenCL behaviour. The OpenCL team can then decide whether or not to update the builtins at their leisure. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D114957/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D114957 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
