ab added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D20358#446218, @ab wrote:
> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D20358#446210, @RKSimon wrote: > > > Is there any reason why we can't just get rid of all the SSE movnt builtins > > and use __builtin_nontemporal_store instead > > (http://reviews.llvm.org/D12313)? > > > I wanted to suggest that too, but I think you'd have problems with the > (natural?) alignment requirement of __builtin_nontemporal_store (whereas > IIRC, movnti & friends accept unaligned pointers). But now that I look at this again, I suppose we could have some __attribute__((aligned(1))), or something like r271214. http://reviews.llvm.org/D20358 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
