carlosgalvezp added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/ClangTidyDiagnosticConsumer.h:50
 struct ClangTidyStats {
-  ClangTidyStats()
-      : ErrorsDisplayed(0), ErrorsIgnoredCheckFilter(0), 
ErrorsIgnoredNOLINT(0),
-        ErrorsIgnoredNonUserCode(0), ErrorsIgnoredLineFilter(0) {}
+  int ErrorsDisplayed{0};
+  int ErrorsIgnoredCheckFilter{0};
----------------
whisperity wrote:
> carlosgalvezp wrote:
> > salman-javed-nz wrote:
> > > What's the prevalent style for class member initialization? `=` or `{}`?
> > > cppcoreguidelines-prefer-member-initializer defaults to `{}` but I have 
> > > seen both types in the code.
> > I tried to find this info in the LLVM coding guidelines but didn't find 
> > anything, so I assume it's maybe up to developers' discretion.
> > 
> > I prefer using braced initialization, since it prevents implicit 
> > conversions:
> > https://godbolt.org/z/4sP4rGsrY
> > 
> > More strict guidelines like Autosar enforce this. Also CppCoreGuidelines 
> > prefer that style as you point out.
> I think this is such a new and within LLVM relatively unused feature 
> (remember we are still pegged to C++14...) that we do not have a consensus on 
> style, and perhaps warrants discussing it on the mailing list.
Just to clarify - this is C++11/14 syntax, nothing really fancy. I'm happy to 
change to " = 0" if people want, I don't have a strong opinion here.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D113847/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D113847

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to