thevinster added inline comments.
================ Comment at: lld/Common/Args.cpp:29 +OptimizationLevel args::getOptLevel(llvm::opt::InputArgList &args, + unsigned int key, ---------------- nit: `getOptLevel` seems a bit too generic for something that's LTO specific. The MachO port has the concept of passing an opt level that generates more efficient opcodes. Suggestions are welcome here - perhaps `getLTOOptLevel` would be better here? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D113738/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D113738 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
