aeubanks added a comment. In D113304#3112937 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D113304#3112937>, @nikic wrote:
> I don't think I fully understand the interaction this has with eager > invalidation. I would have expected that if we eagerly invalidate, then this > fine-grained invalidation wouldn't make much of a difference, because we > invalidate anyway after processing a function. if we've already calculated e.g. DT for all functions in an SCC prior to visiting the SCC, currently if an SCC pass changes any of the functions, we'd invalidate analyses for all the functions in the SCC, meaning function passes in the SCC adaptor would have to recalculate. but if we do this fine-grained invalidation we won't have to recalculate DT in the function passes for functions that weren't modified in the SCC pass I'll add this to the description Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D113304/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D113304 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
