Ashimaru added a comment. In D34654#3022728 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D34654#3022728>, @alexfh wrote:
> Repeating my question from an earlier comment: would a header glob list > (similar to how the format of the `-checks=` flag) be enough for the use > cases folks have? On the one hand glob list doesn't support all the features > of regular expressions, but are they all useful for matching paths? Glob list > in clang-tidy currently supports set union (similar to regex `|`) and <any > subsequence> - `*` (regex `.*`). If needed, the support can be expanded with > `?`, character classes, character ranges and/or other features of POSIX globs > (https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/glob.7.html). On the flipside, glob > list has a cleaner syntax (no need to quote characters common in paths - like > `.`), and allows to easily express exclusion of subsets. It should be a > convenient tool to represent a set of files / directories. In comparison to > the proposed header-filter + exclude-header-filter glob list makes it > possible to naturally express restrictions similar to "everything under a/ > (except for everything under a/b/ (except for everything under a/b/c/))" - > `a/,-a/b/,a/b/c/`. > > What do folks think? Yes in my case this would be enough :) Repository: rL LLVM CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D34654/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D34654 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
