carlosgalvezp added a comment.
Thanks for the review!
I'm not super happy with the commit in the sense that it feels more like a
workaround than a proper fix, with the hardcoded name `__cuda_built_in` and so
on. But honestly I don't know how implement it more properly, for example check
if the `BaseTypeName` is a CUDA built-in type. Another issue is that currently
one can't ignore warnings from system headers (like
`__clang_cuda_builtin_vars.h`)if they come from a macro defined there. But I
suppose that's a harder problem to tackle.
But if you are happy with the patch I can go ahead and merge, and come back to
it if I learn how to improve it later on as I get to learn more about the
codebase.
================
Comment at:
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/StaticAccessedThroughInstanceCheck.cpp:75
+ // Do not warn for CUDA built-in variables.
+ if (StringRef(BaseTypeName).contains("__cuda_builtin_"))
+ return;
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> I presume we want this to strictly be a prefix?
Sure, but then I can't put the test in a named namespace. I changed it to
anonymous namespace + link to Bugzilla, hope it works.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D112334/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D112334
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
