MyDeveloperDay added a comment. In D112056#3073142 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D112056#3073142>, @lhames wrote:
> I think that this should fix the issue I saw, but `clang-format` will still > crash when passed a `-lines=0:X` option. Would it make sense to either error > out in that tool, or teach the tool to ignore `-lines=0:0` options if they're > guaranteed to be no-ops for formatting? I think my concern with simply ignoring them is that clang-format could be given multiple -lines calls, what should it do? silently ignore the -lines:0:0 or error out on all the other changes, I'd be a little concerned because we then enter into other issues like what happens if someone give -lines:-1:3 should it error out or adjust itself to -lines:1:2 ultimately I think silently ignoring could be more dangerous rather than asserting or trying to correct it, this way it ensures that people fix up how they are calling it (as in this case), having said that I'm not a massive fan of asserting either. I think maybe we should fix this as a regression and take sometime to think if we want a more guarded solution separately. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D112056/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D112056 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
