ASDenysPetrov added a comment. In D111640#3058622 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D111640#3058622>, @martong wrote:
> In D111640#3058304 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D111640#3058304>, @steakhal > wrote: > >> It looks good. >> Do you think we could remove the `RangedConstraintManager` abstraction? > > Definitely. What's more, we could split out cohesive implementation details > like `RangeSet`, `EquivalenceClass` from `RangeConstraintManager.cpp` into > their own implementation files. Sound thought! +1 Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D111640/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D111640 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
