serge-sans-paille added a comment. In D109967#3044464 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D109967#3044464>, @rnk wrote:
> Thanks for doing this, this approach looks like it incorporated my feedback > on the previous approach. Yeah, listened to the wise men... and struggled a lot doing so ;-) ================ Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.cpp:3177 + // PR9614. Avoid cases where the source code is lying to us. An available // externally function should have an equivalent function somewhere else, ---------------- rnk wrote: > Can this trivially recursive builtin detection stuff be removed now? That > would be great. Let me give it a try! Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D109967/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D109967 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
