MyDeveloperDay added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.rst:3649 ``SBPO_ControlStatementsExceptForEachMacros`` remains an alias for backward compatibility. ---------------- Now I look back here, why where these Macro considered the same as for loops? why would we want ``` for (....) Q_FOREACH(...) ``` So this really does need a struct or we'll be eventually be adding `SBPO_ControlStatementsAndFunctionDefinitionsExceptControlMacrosButNotIfAndDefinatelyWhilesAndSometimesSwitchButOnlyOnTheSecondThursdayOfTheMonth` ``` SpaceBeforeParen: AfterFunctionDefinitionName: false AfterFunctionDeclarationName: true AfterSwitch: true AfterForeachMacros: false .... (there are likely others) ``` ` Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D110833/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D110833 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits