MyDeveloperDay added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.rst:3649
     ``SBPO_ControlStatementsExceptForEachMacros`` remains an alias for
     backward compatibility.
 
----------------
Now I look back here, why where these Macro considered the same as for loops? 
why would we want

```
for (....)
Q_FOREACH(...)
```

So this really does need a struct or we'll be eventually be adding

`SBPO_ControlStatementsAndFunctionDefinitionsExceptControlMacrosButNotIfAndDefinatelyWhilesAndSometimesSwitchButOnlyOnTheSecondThursdayOfTheMonth`

```
SpaceBeforeParen:
     AfterFunctionDefinitionName: false
     AfterFunctionDeclarationName: true
     AfterSwitch: true
     AfterForeachMacros: false
     .... (there are likely others)
```
     
`







Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D110833/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D110833

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to