kbobyrev added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/HeadersTests.cpp:234 + auto Includes = collectIncludes(); + EXPECT_THAT(Includes.IncludeChildren[getID(MainFile)], + UnorderedElementsAreArray({getID(FooHeader), getID(BarHeader)})); ---------------- sammccall wrote: > kbobyrev wrote: > > sammccall wrote: > > > Why are we asserting on every element of the map one at a time, instead > > > of the whole map at once? Seems like it would be more regular and easier > > > to read. > > > > > > I'd probably just write: > > > ``` > > > DenseMap<HeaderID, SmallVector<HeaderID>> Expected = { ... }; > > > EXPECT_EQ(Expected, Includes.IncludeChildren); > > > ``` > > This would expect the elements in the map to be in a particular order, > > isn't this something we don't want? > `==` on DenseMap doesn't consider order. > > If you mean the order within map values (i.e. lists of child edges): these > are in the order the `#includes` appear in the file, which seems fine to > depend on to me Yes, I initially meant the `SmallVector` order, but yeah, this seems reasonable, thank you! Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D110386/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D110386 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits