kbobyrev added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/HeadersTests.cpp:234
+  auto Includes = collectIncludes();
+  EXPECT_THAT(Includes.IncludeChildren[getID(MainFile)],
+              UnorderedElementsAreArray({getID(FooHeader), getID(BarHeader)}));
----------------
sammccall wrote:
> kbobyrev wrote:
> > sammccall wrote:
> > > Why are we asserting on every element of the map one at a time, instead 
> > > of the whole map at once? Seems like it would be more regular and easier 
> > > to read.
> > > 
> > > I'd probably just write:
> > > ```
> > > DenseMap<HeaderID, SmallVector<HeaderID>> Expected = { ... };
> > > EXPECT_EQ(Expected, Includes.IncludeChildren);
> > > ```
> > This would expect the elements in the map to be in a particular order, 
> > isn't this something we don't want?
> `==` on DenseMap doesn't consider order.
> 
> If you mean the order within map values (i.e. lists of child edges): these 
> are in the order the `#includes` appear in the file, which seems fine to 
> depend on to me
Yes, I initially meant the `SmallVector` order, but yeah, this seems 
reasonable, thank you!


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D110386/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D110386

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to