nemanjai added a comment. In D110128#3018992 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D110128#3018992>, @phosek wrote:
> @MaskRay Do you think we should gate the use of this feature on > `-fbinutils-version=` or `-fuse-ld=lld`? It'd be nice if the owner of > `clang-ppc64le-rhel` builder could update the binutils version but I'm not > sure how feasible is it. We certainly don't mind updating binutils to a supported version. However, if a specific version of binutils (or really any other software package) is required by Clang/LLVM, that should be documented at https://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#software Of course, if our bot has a version of binutils that is older than the one listed there currently, we will be sure to update it ASAP. But of course, as @MaskRay pointed out, this may not be an issue. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D110128/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D110128 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
