dmgreen added a comment. In D110258#3015484 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D110258#3015484>, @david-arm wrote:
> Hi @dmgreen, this is specifically being introduced for SVE targets to help > make informed cost model decisions regarding the value of vscale - see > D110259 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D110259>. We thought that using the > "tune-cpu" attribute might be a good way of doing this. Yeah. I added comments there. It would feel strange to me to have a single part of the tuning features for a cpu based on a `tune-cpu`, where everything else uses the `target-cpu`. We should try and make -mtune work better, but we should aim to do that consistently in a way that doesn't just make thing _more_ confusing! Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D110258/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D110258 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
