fhahn planned changes to this revision. fhahn added a comment. In D108832#2969538 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D108832#2969538>, @erichkeane wrote:
> Codewise I'm ok, but I don't feel comfortable making the direction decision. > I'd like to see some level of 'state of things' on the vector types (like, > under what conditions does GCC support this, and under what types??), but > even then I'm not sure I'm the right one to approve this. Thanks! I'm preparing a proposal for cfe-dev at the moment. In addition to supporting element wise min/max/round & co I think we should also make sure the proposal also allows adding reduction versions in a consistent manner. I don't think that would be possible when overloading the existing builtins, so I am exploring a different direction at the moment. Marking as changes planned for now. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D108832/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D108832 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
